Administrators of Color: Selling Out or Buying In? [From The Vault] - The Jose Vilson

Administrators of Color: Selling Out or Buying In? [From The Vault]

by Jose Vilson on December 26, 2012

in Jose

Scene from Lean On Me

Scene from Lean On Me

This week, I’m releasing some of the pieces I’ve written that never saw the light of day for different reasons. Here’s the first.

Date: 5/10/12

Someone told me recently, “I think these kids respond better to males than females, especially as teachers.”

That hasn’t been my experience, but I let them proceed. “It’s like, some of these kids need guidance or someone to look up to in school, and there’s a lot of women in school already.” Usually, I let them keep talking because it usually leads to a discussion about becoming an administrator (i.e. me). Thanks to a few conversations I’ve had with some important people in my life, I don’t see myself going into administration yet.

Part of my hesitation stems from the plethora of popular examples of administrators of color. People within certain circles always have to consider the question: do administrators of color sell out or buy in?

The caricature of administrators of color comes from the movie Lean on Me, the story of the cantankerous autocrat Joe Louis Clark, then-principal of Eastside High School in Paterson, NJ played by Morgan Freeman. Many use the images of the bat-wielding bullhorn-blaring authoritarian as inspiration for how they would choose to run their school. The teaching profession is plagued with the White savior complex of movies Dangerous Minds and The Ron Clark Story, but it pales in comparison to the movies like Lean on Me. Where you might think an administrator of color would seek to set positive examples for children bereft of such models, we have people who proffer the Joe Clarks of the world as the paragon.

Unnecessary.

Outside of the movies, administrators of color aren’t recruited to just be themselves. Not only do they have to work twice as hard to prove their viability, they have to adopt an image of callousness in some form. Some administrators crack down on students, particularly their children of color. Emphasis on crack, like a whip, if you will. Districts presumably allowed principals to treat students as they pleased so long as they controlled them and put their butts in the seats of class, no matter their situations. These principals would not make it past October of their first year in a school with a predominantly White student population, but in these schools, accountability reigns, and by accountability, I mean hammering down on discipline without regards to their academics and passions.

Other administrators have to act tough on teachers and their “status-quo” unions (read: Dr. Steve Perry). Those unionized teachers always come by the clock and punch out punctually. The only teachers in their eyes worth a contract are those that work beyond the means of their union contract (whatever that means). In order to promote their own agenda, they can simultaneously speak well of their own achievements and how good they are for kids while ostracizing the school community that makes school happen. While they profit off the caricature of a small segment of teachers (many of whom made those principals successful), children suffer.

Those are adult problems.

These models all center around developing a callous demeanor towards any one critical entity of our school community. This also benefits districts willing to hire them because they can assuage parents seeking traditional, Civil Rights ideals while never fixing the system that undoes these children. It often works to further the current education reform agenda, too. They can use the same intonations that Civil Rights leaders did as smoke-and-mirror techniques for messages that actually hurt our communities.

Using President Barack Obama’s image and Race To The Top policies for opening and shutting down schools and reopening them under the same conditions, administrators are often implored to buy in. Too bad some of them sell out.

For instance, when people first found out Brooke Harris was fired for teaching her students about the tragedy of Trayvon Martin, they presumed the administrators were White. They aren’t. To wit, the superintendent said she had no problem with the lesson, but the timing hurt Ms. Harris’ cause. The astute reader can deduce two things from this sentiment: the only curriculum that matters is the one prescribed by the district no matter the current events that affect our children and the teacher had to be fired so the other people of color could keep their jobs. If we want to talk about “adult problems,” let’s talk about the fact that a teacher just tried to prepare her students for a world still not ready for true equality and her superiors thwarted it for the sake of a world still not ready for true equality.

It’s a major failure, and a dilemma unresolved by those who go into higher positions of education.

Credit belongs to those who seek to ingrain themselves in the communities they represent. Some principals actually understand that the only way to change the system that sets up our least empowered to fail is to show them caring and respect, both for their intellect and emotions. They work twice as hard for their reputation, and learn how to bob and weave past the oft-constricting regulations of their district for the benefit of their students. In the new century, we need the type of leader that can inspire children to greatness selflessly.

Originally, principals were considered the teacher of teachers. That’s a tradition we can all buy.

Jose, who wonders where Brooke Harris went …

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

Faith December 26, 2012 at 10:22 am

Jose,
Your article was very well articulated, thank you. I agree that there is an issue with Administrators of \”color\” selling out to the \”non- pigmentedly blessed\” way of running school business. I have witnessed the see-saw power struggles and the ill effects resulting. There is so much to say on this fascinating topic, especially as I too am entering into the career of education in a few years.

Reply

Jose December 26, 2012 at 5:21 pm

Faith, thank you for reading. The effects of “power” on people can be tremendous, bring out some of the not-so-nice qualities about us once we enter that domain.

Reply

Chris Lehmann December 26, 2012 at 10:22 am

Just… yes.

And then there\’s all of the other stuff that flows from this. I have heard admins of color speak so poorly of both the teachers of color and the kids of color who don\’t \”act right\” in their eyes. Whether it was a Black district official at a new teacher workshop telling a group of new teachers – including a group of SLA teachers – that \”black teachers are the worst teachers in SDP,\” or the Joe Clark style admin who dismisses kids because they don\’t fit his/her definition of what the \”right\” kind of child of color.

And to take it to another place, there are also now a subset of white admins in our cities who have learned the lessons of the system that supports this behavior and therefore now try to act like the white version of Joe Clark. So now you have layer after layer of what that creates for kids and teachers as well.

So much work to do.

Reply

Jose December 26, 2012 at 5:23 pm

Or, more succinctly, go back to cracking the whip that wasn’t cool to do after King.

OK, now that I put it out there …

Reply

Ganapati December 26, 2012 at 11:07 am

Great piece Jose, bringing a voice that is seldom used. While race is a major factor in administrative decisions, all that you have said rings true for many administrators off all backgrounds, at least in the city. I have watched many slowly compromise his or her ideals in order to seem like they are part of \”the solution\” rather than part of the problem. We all hurt from the way educrats appropriate lingo in order to push the agenda. When someone questions it, that person is made to feel like he or she is not willing to do what is best for the students. Our voices are getting dulled out and or vilified and the data is construed to make it look true.

Reply

Jose December 26, 2012 at 5:25 pm

That’s why we need to keep talking back. Keep doing it. The lingo can change, but we have to be at the forefront of it.

Reply

Regina December 28, 2012 at 12:59 am

You are correct in the assertion that many of the whip cracking admins of color wouldn\’t last in a white district with those methods. I have witnessed an admin of color come and go within a matter of months, for such behavior. Teachers grieved her daily, parents complained, etc. until finally she left/was asked to leave….not quite sure which. It is extremely (there\’s not enough caps, exclamation points, etc to communicate the extreme) difficult to be an educator of color in an all white setting…..extremely…and for me most of the issues are based in dealing with the adults….

Reply

Jose Vilson December 30, 2012 at 9:28 pm

Regina, golly. You went in. It’s so multi-faceted that you’d have to write a book on it …

Reply

Regina December 30, 2012 at 11:32 pm

Lol….too strong?

Reply

Jose Vilson December 30, 2012 at 11:33 pm

Too perfect.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: